|
|
| Final Fantasy vs Legend of Zelda |
Final Fantasy Vs. Legend Of Zelda In somewhat recent
arguments some say the Final Fantasy series kicks the Zelda series butt. Of coarse most of
us here KNOW that's not true, Final Fantasy sure has huge areas to fight but it doesn't
involve 20 min. of walking on foot to get from one side of the land to another once you do
something its over you never need to go back there again.
The Zelda has you explore and cross a VERY large land of Hyrule
where if you miss something you could most likely go back and still get it. The Zelda
series doesn't follow the RPG fighting style but it dose make the fighting more real by
the way they do it (I mean come on can anyone honestly say they have been in a fight where
you stand 50 ft. away from a person, do some attack, then wait for them to do an attack)
in Zelda you fight an enemy the way you WOULD fight an enemy.
Another thing is, in Zelda you only control one person, Link,
(sometimes someone will follow you but that's is a bit different they cant do anything to
help increasing the challenge of the game) some people may look at this as bad but it
really is alot better.
Most of the stuff I have said leads up to one major thing even
though all the weird creatures the play of all Zelda games (and gameplay) have been more
realistic than Final Fantasy. Even though Final Fantasy has good story lines Zelda usually
surpasses them in imagination and the skill needed to beat a Zelda game is much harder to
have then in a game where a guy can hold a sword 5 times bigger than his body and swing it
like a feather and still be able to block attacks. |
|
